<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:57:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris D.</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168851</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168851</guid>
		<description>i love it!! not had a problem, love the fluid mobility. does need a few plug ins but can’t wait to see the expanded on product WAY TO GO GOOGLE

(sorry had to edit) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love it!! not had a problem, love the fluid mobility. does need a few plug ins but can’t wait to see the expanded on product WAY TO GO GOOGLE</p>
<p>(sorry had to edit) <img src='http://www.aside.in/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imtiaz</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168796</link>
		<dc:creator>imtiaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168796</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s fast, been using it past couple of days now and except for the memory handling part, where it seems to be going the M$ way, I think it&#039;s going ot make a dent somewhere.... no definitely not giving up on FF just yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s fast, been using it past couple of days now and except for the memory handling part, where it seems to be going the M$ way, I think it&#8217;s going ot make a dent somewhere&#8230;. no definitely not giving up on FF just yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naina</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168794</link>
		<dc:creator>Naina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168794</guid>
		<description>@PeeKing - unfortunately - for now, I have no idea either - have no clue who designed the Google Chrome logo and i won&#039;t be surprised if it was done internally at Google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@PeeKing &#8211; unfortunately &#8211; for now, I have no idea either &#8211; have no clue who designed the Google Chrome logo and i won&#8217;t be surprised if it was done internally at Google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeKing</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168787</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168787</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know who designed this logo? I cannot find any literature on this what so ever. I can&#039;t even find out if Google did it themselves, which is unlikely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know who designed this logo? I cannot find any literature on this what so ever. I can&#8217;t even find out if Google did it themselves, which is unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulrik H. Kold</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168620</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulrik H. Kold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168620</guid>
		<description>@Naina: I can only second your comment about not having had the time to barely open the bowels of Ubiquity. I am looking forward to do that.

I foresee a flood of useful commands for all sorts of utility sites :-) I better get started writing some. But the plugin itself can come a long way still, it&#039;s only version 0.1.1 - there is lots of potential still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Naina: I can only second your comment about not having had the time to barely open the bowels of Ubiquity. I am looking forward to do that.</p>
<p>I foresee a flood of useful commands for all sorts of utility sites <img src='http://www.aside.in/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I better get started writing some. But the plugin itself can come a long way still, it&#8217;s only version 0.1.1 &#8211; there is lots of potential still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naina</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168564</link>
		<dc:creator>Naina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168564</guid>
		<description>@Ulrik - Yeah! the ubiquity thing is absolutely phenomenal - especially the part where you can develop your own commands - I haven&#039;t even managed to scratch the surface. Who knew Firefox would compete with Google Chrome! We&#039;re all used to watching Google coming out tops in pretty much everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ulrik &#8211; Yeah! the ubiquity thing is absolutely phenomenal &#8211; especially the part where you can develop your own commands &#8211; I haven&#8217;t even managed to scratch the surface. Who knew Firefox would compete with Google Chrome! We&#8217;re all used to watching Google coming out tops in pretty much everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulrik H. Kold</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168561</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulrik H. Kold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168561</guid>
		<description>I actually had a hard time logging into GMail as well as any other Google app. That is: I did not even make it through the Single sign-on. I&#039;m suspecting it&#039;s a problem with the firewall here at work, but.. come on, it&#039;s designed for their own apps. Why would this be a problem?

and #2: I can only scroll down - not up again. I have to drag the scrollbar back up to get to the top of the page. Not good enough, Google.

I&#039;m sticking with Firefox for now - though I am impressed with the overall speed of Google Chrome.

Firefox with the Ubiquity plugin is the way to go for now, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had a hard time logging into GMail as well as any other Google app. That is: I did not even make it through the Single sign-on. I&#8217;m suspecting it&#8217;s a problem with the firewall here at work, but.. come on, it&#8217;s designed for their own apps. Why would this be a problem?</p>
<p>and #2: I can only scroll down &#8211; not up again. I have to drag the scrollbar back up to get to the top of the page. Not good enough, Google.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sticking with Firefox for now &#8211; though I am impressed with the overall speed of Google Chrome.</p>
<p>Firefox with the Ubiquity plugin is the way to go for now, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naina</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168553</link>
		<dc:creator>Naina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168553</guid>
		<description>@iwebie - yeah, Google Chrome is simple enough - I&#039;m sticking to Firefox too - for some reason it took ages to load some stuff that doesn&#039;t usually take that long on Firefox.

@ AlexG - I like the simple colors the best actually - wish there was some &#039;brief&#039; on how / why they came up with it.

@Ulrik - you said that right! I totally want to see it on a tee too - a large front print! Oooh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@iwebie &#8211; yeah, Google Chrome is simple enough &#8211; I&#8217;m sticking to Firefox too &#8211; for some reason it took ages to load some stuff that doesn&#8217;t usually take that long on Firefox.</p>
<p>@ AlexG &#8211; I like the simple colors the best actually &#8211; wish there was some &#8216;brief&#8217; on how / why they came up with it.</p>
<p>@Ulrik &#8211; you said that right! I totally want to see it on a tee too &#8211; a large front print! Oooh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulrik H. Kold</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168546</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulrik H. Kold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168546</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d really like to see that logo on a t-shirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really like to see that logo on a t-shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexG</title>
		<link>http://www.aside.in/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-168540</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aside.in/blog/?p=272#comment-168540</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bit simplistic (Ronald McDonald Windows XP style), and a bit like the old digital game Simon... but it&#039;s not too bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit simplistic (Ronald McDonald Windows XP style), and a bit like the old digital game Simon&#8230; but it&#8217;s not too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.350 seconds -->

